This person is confused because the people who rightfully complained that Rush Limbaugh called a woman a slut and jokingly agreed to pay for her birth control provided she would tape the sex for his enjoyment went on to form this movement. Rock The Slut Vote.
A quick perusal of this blog revealed a host of errors in basic math, biology, and others, but this particular article caught my eye.
They complain about how movements like this encourage us to treat women as mere sexual things for the entertainment of men, even comparing U.S. culture to that of fundamentalist Muslim countries. They think that modern feminism is the same as that of Islam because they both treat women as sex objects for men. I say they are completely different because what exemplifies the type of Islam they are speaking about is a desire for men to control every aspect of women's sexuality, while feminists want women to be in control of it.
Unlike the bloggers claim feminists are not saying that women are nothing more than vaginas, but to pretend that sexuality is not a very important part of most people's identity is absurd. To me it seems clear that the use of the term slut is meant ironically
and at no point does the "Rock The Slut Vote" site advocate for women to
have sex with any man who asks her. There seems to be an objection to the attempt get rid of the negative connotation of the term slut based upon the notion that women who have had lots of sexual partners are bad people right? Also apparently words can never be redefined.
This blogger could probably do with an education about the gay rights movement. the term "gay" was originally used as an insult, and the movement actually did over a period of several decades change it to a normal and accepted term by using it to describe themselves. So the concept is not as crazy as this blogger seems to think.
The blogger ends their article complaining about the lack of impact Christians seem to have on mainstream culture, but somehow also manages to believe that things Lady Gaga sings about somehow represents the mainstream culture of people who are no longer teenagers. I'm guessing the reason they fail to impact mainstream culture is that they have no clue what that even is, but they have such a beautiful straw-man of what they think it is who am I to get in the way of that?
It seems that these good Chrsitians are the usual ones that can't quite figure out that feminism doesn't mean obediance to ancient patriarchal nonsense. 2 Peter 2 is quite a paen to how violent and ignorant the Christian god is and congratulating themselves for being such special snowflakes. it does a great job of showing how evil missionary work is though.
ReplyDelete